Real Estate Mortgage Law
(Act 3135, as amended by RA 4118)
a.
Coverage
The law covers only real estate
mortgages. It is intended merely to regulate the extrajudicial sale and
redemption of the property if and when the mortgagee is given a special power
or express authority to do so in the deed itself or in a document annexed
thereto.
b.
Remedies available to mortgagee upon default of the mortgagor
The mortgagee has a choice of one
(1) of two (2) remedies, but he cannot have both. The mortgagee may (i)
foreclose the mortgage or (ii) file an ordinary action to collect the debt, i.e.
specific performance.
When
the mortgagee chooses the foreclosure of the mortgage as a remedy, he enforces
his lien by the sale on foreclosure of the mortgaged property. The proceeds of
the sale will be applied to the satisfaction of the debt. With this remedy, he
has a prior lien on the property. In case of a deficiency, the mortgagee has
the right to claim for the deficiency resulting from the price obtained in the
sale of the real property at public auction and the outstanding obligation at
the time of the foreclosure proceedings. (Soriano
v. Enriquez, 24 Phil. 584; Banco de Islas
Filipinas v. Concepcion Hijos, 53 Phil. 86; Banco Nacional v. Barreto, 53 Phil. 101)
On the other hand, if the mortgagee resorts
to an action to collect the debt, he thereby waives his mortgage lien. He will
have no more priority over the mortgaged property. If the judgment in the
action to collect is favorable to him, and it becomes final and executory, he
can enforce said judgment by execution. He can even levy execution on the same
mortgaged property, but he will not have priority over the latter and there may
be other creditors who have better lien on the properties of the mortgagor. Caltex Phils. vs. IAC, August 25, 1989
If mortgagor issues post-dated checks,
resorting to a criminal action for violation of BP 22 also precludes the remedy
of foreclosure and vice versa. Recovery of the amount due is deemed included in
the action for violation of BP 22.
TIP: If the mortgage covers the total claim,
then foreclose. If not, still foreclose for after all you can still collect the
deficiency from the principal debtor (if mortgagor is a third person), not the
mortgagor unless the latter bound himself solidarily liable with the borrower. Make
it a last resort to file a criminal action because in reality it takes much
longer to pursue BP 22.
c.
Need for special power of attorney
Under
Section 1 of Act No. 3135, a special power of attorney must be inserted in or
attached to any Real Estate Mortgage.
Without proof of petitioner's special
authority to foreclose, the Clerk of Court as Ex-Oficio Sheriff is precluded
from acting on the application for extrajudicial foreclosure. (Office of the Court Administrator v. Pardo, RTJ-08-2109, April
30, 2008; Casano v. Magat, 425 Phil.
356, 360-361 (2002); Paguyo v. Gatbunton,
A.M. No. P-06-2135, May 25, 2007, 523 SCRA 156, 161).
d.
Authority to foreclose extrajudicially
A mortgage may be foreclosed
extrajudicially where there is inserted in the contract a clause giving the
mortgagee the power upon default of the debtor, to foreclose the mortgage by an
extrajudicial sale of the mortgaged property. The authority to sell is not extinguished by the death
of the mortgagor (or mortgagee).
e.
Procedure
(1) Where to file
All applications
shall be filed with the Executive Judge through the Clerk of Court, who is also
the Ex-Officio Sheriff. See Sec. 1, Circular No. 7-2002, Guidelines for the
enforcement of Supreme Court Resolution of December 14, 1999 in A.M. no.
99-10-05-0 (re: Procedure in extra-judicial foreclosure of mortgage), as
amended by the Resolutions dated January 30, 2001 and August 7, 2001.
(2) Where to sell
If venue is subject to stipulation, such sale shall be
made in said place (i.e., the place so stipulated) or in the municipal building
of the municipality in which the property or part thereof is situated. (ibid.)
(3) Posting requirement
Failure to advertise a mortgage foreclosure sale in
compliance with statutory requirements constitutes a jurisdictional defect
invalidating the sale. A substantial error or omission in a notice of sale will
render the notice insufficient and vitiate the sale. (PNB v. Nepomuceno, 394 SCRA 405, 2002)
(4) Publication requirement
(a)
Sufficiency of newspaper publication
Notice shall
also be published once a week for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in a
newspaper of general circulation. The newspaper need not have the largest
circulation so long as it is of general circulation. To be a newspaper of
general circulation, it is enough that it is published for the dissemination of
local news and general information; that it has a bona fide subscription list
of paying subscribers; and that it is published at regular intervals. The newspaper must not be devoted to the
interests or entertainment of a particular class, profession, trade, calling,
race or religious denomination. The newspaper need not have the largest
circulation so long as it is of general circulation (Perez vs. Perez (2005)) in
the municipality or city where the property is located. Metrobank v.
Peñafiel, G.R. No. 173976
Feb. 27, 2009
(b) Need for republication in case of
postponement
(c)
Personal notice to the mortgagor when and when not needed
General
Rule: Personal notice to the mortgagor is not generally required. Exception:
Unless required in the mortgage contract, the lack of personal notice to the
mortgagor is not a ground to set aside a foreclosure sale.
Unless otherwise stipulated by the
parties to the mortgage contract, the debtor-mortgagor need not be personally
served a copy of the notice of the extra- judicial foreclosure. SC Circular 7-2002
f.
Possession by purchaser of foreclosed property
Upon failure of
the debtor to redeem the property within one (1) year after the date of the
registration of the certificate of sale, winning bidder becomes the absolute
owner.
g.
Remedy of debtor if foreclosure is not proper
h.
Redemption
3. Written notice of redemption served on
officer who made the sale.
(1) Who may redeem
a. The debtor;
b. The debtor's
successors-in-interest;
c. Any judicial
creditor or judgment creditor of the debtor;
d. Any person having
a lien on the property subsequent to the mortgage or deed of trust under which
the property is sold (Redemption
price to be paid by accommodation mortgagors).
(2) Amount of Redemption price
a.
Limited to the winning bid price plus twelve percent (12%) interest per
annum.
(3) Period for redemption
Natural persons: Within 1 year from and after the
date of the sale. Sec. 6
Juridical persons: Until but not after the
registration of the certificate of foreclosure sale with the applicable
Register of Deeds, which in no case shall be more than 3 months after
foreclosure, whichever is earlier. (Sec. 47, R.A. 8791)
(4) Effect of pendency of action for
annulment of sale
The filing of court action to enforce
redemption has effect of preserving the redemptioner’s rights; and freezing the
expiration of one year period to redeem. (Banco
Filipino v Court of Appeals)
i.
Writ of possession
(1) Ministerial duty of the court
The judge to whom an application for writ of possession
is filed need not look into the validity of the mortgage or the manner of its
foreclosure. In the issuance of a writ of possession, no discretion is left to
the Trial Court. Any question regarding the cancellation of the writ in respect
to the validity/regularity of the foreclosure sale or the mortgage should be
determined in a subsequent proceeding (PNB
v. Sanao). Such question cannot be raised
to oppose the issuance of the writ, since the proceeding is ex parte. (Samson
vs Rivera, 2004)
After the consolidation of
title in the buyer’s name for failure of the mortgagor to redeem, the writ of
possession becomes a matter of right
(2) Enforcement against third
parties
The
purchaser or last redemption shall be entitled to possession of the property
upon the finality of the order of confirmation or upon the expiration of the
period of redemption, unless a third party is actually holding the same
adversely to the judgment debtor.
(3) Pendency of action for annulment
of sale
The
pendency of a separate civil suit questioning the validity of the sale of the
mortgaged property cannot bar the issuance of the writ of possession. DBP vs Spouses Gatal (2005)
j. Annulment of sale (See g. Remedy of debtor if
foreclosure is not proper, supra)
READ ALSO: Full Text of Act 3135 Real Estate Mortgage Law
Incoming search terms:
real estate mortgage law
redemption of mortgage
procedure for foreclosure
writ of possession
foreclosure of mortgage
annulment of sale
extrajudicial foreclosure
remedies on foreclosure
rules of court
Act 3135